In many parts of the world, land has always held a significant value – not just in terms of agriculture, but also as a symbol of cultural identity and connection to one’s history and ancestors. However, with the rise of modern governments and their need for revenue, a contentious issue has emerged – the imposition of ground rent by the government on the people.
The issue at hand is that while the government claims that land is a state-owned property and therefore eligible for taxation, the people argue that land is a natural resource, not created by the government but by Mother Nature herself. This debate has resulted in a tug-of-war between the government, the people, and traditional rulers who firmly believe that land belongs to them and their ancestral inhabitants.
From a legal standpoint, the government does have the authority to impose taxes on land as it is deemed as a form of property. However, traditional rulers view land as their ancestral inheritance, passed down through generations, and therefore, not subject to government taxation. This has created a complex situation where the views of these three parties seem to be in direct conflict with each other.
So, how do we navigate towards a peaceful resolution in this matter? The key lies in finding a balance between traditional and government provisions for land ownership and taxation. Both parties need to understand each other’s perspectives and work towards finding common ground.
Firstly, the government needs to acknowledge the cultural and historical significance of land to traditional rulers and their communities. They must recognize that land is not merely a commodity to be taxed but an essential aspect of their identity and way of life.
On the other hand, traditional rulers need to understand the necessity of government revenue and the role land taxation plays in generating it. They must also understand that the government has a responsibility to provide services and infrastructure to its citizens, which require financial resources.
In this regard, a collaborative and consultative approach is essential. The government and traditional rulers should engage in open and productive dialogue to find mutually agreeable solutions. This can include exemptions or reduced rates for traditional rulers and their communities or alternative forms of taxation that do not put a burden on the people.
Furthermore, the government can also work towards creating a system where traditional rulers are given a more significant role in the management and decision-making process of land taxation. This will not only address their concerns but also promote a sense of ownership and accountability among the traditional rulers.
In conclusion, the issue of ground rent imposition by the government on the people while traditional rulers claim land as their ancestral inheritance is a complex one. However, with open communication, understanding, and a willingness to find common ground, a peaceful resolution can be achieved. It is time for all parties involved to come together and work towards a fair and just solution that benefits both the government and the people while respecting the cultural significance of land to traditional rulers.
– Benjamin Ibrahim, a Retired Permanent Secretary, writes from Lokoja.
