…Older parents and European immigrants show greatest reluctance toward immunisation*
By Stephen Adeleye.
The battle against vaccine hesitancy in the United Kingdom has clearer targets following research that identifies which parents are most likely to resist childhood immunisation and why.
Dr. Kennedy Oberhiri Obohwemu of Scholars School System (Leeds Trinity University Partnership), United Kingdom, conducted a nationwide survey of more than 800 parents with young children, uncovering distinct patterns in vaccine attitudes. Age, ethnicity, and political beliefs emerged as powerful predictors of hesitancy, while income and education showed surprisingly little influence.
Who Hesitates and Why
The research measured vaccine attitudes using the Parent Attitudes about Childhood Vaccines scale, a validated tool that produces scores from 0 to 100. Parents scoring above 50 demonstrate significant hesitancy about immunising their children against preventable diseases.
Older parents consistently scored higher on hesitancy measures than younger ones. This pattern defies expectations that age brings greater acceptance of established medical practices. Instead, decades of accumulated exposure to vaccine-critical messaging, combined with memories of past vaccine controversies, appear to foster skepticism that younger parents lack.
Ethnicity proved equally significant. Parents identifying as “White Other,” a category including Polish, Irish, Italian, Romanian, German, and other non-British Europeans, recorded the highest hesitancy levels. These communities have received minimal attention in vaccine promotion efforts despite their growing presence in the UK.
Political ideology created another clear divide. Parents holding conservative views expressed greater vaccine reluctance than those with progressive orientations. Health decisions have become entangled with broader ideological positions about government authority, individual freedom, and institutional trust.
The Trust Problem
Two interconnected factors amplified hesitancy across demographic groups. Distrust in the NHS created fertile ground for vaccine resistance. Parents questioning the healthcare system’s reliability or motives proved far more likely to delay or refuse childhood immunisations.
Safety concerns about vaccines themselves, though contradicted by overwhelming scientific evidence, remained potent influences on parental decisions. Worries about side effects, ingredient safety, and discredited claims linking vaccines to autism persist despite decades of research demonstrating vaccine safety.
Social media emerged as a particularly troublesome influence. Parents who turned to social platforms for vaccine information demonstrated higher hesitancy rates, reflecting the torrent of misinformation circulating online. False claims packaged in emotionally resonant formats exploit parental protective instincts and spread rapidly through networks.
Unexpected Findings
Income and education levels showed no meaningful relationship with vaccine hesitancy. This challenges common assumptions that higher education naturally produces greater scientific literacy and vaccine acceptance.
Well-educated parents sometimes exhibit strong vaccine skepticism, selectively applying critical thinking to scrutinise immunisation while embracing unverified alternative health claims. Academic credentials offer no protection against misinformation, particularly when it confirms existing anxieties about child safety.
The absence of income effects indicates that vaccine hesitancy spans economic classes. Affluent and disadvantaged families alike harbor doubts, though perhaps for different reasons and from different information sources.
Real-World Consequences
Vaccine hesitancy threatens public health by allowing preventable diseases to regain footholds. When immunisation rates drop below critical thresholds, outbreaks can occur. Measles, whooping cough, and other illnesses that were nearly eliminated have resurged in areas with low vaccination coverage.
Young children face particular vulnerability. Infants too young for certain vaccines depend on herd immunity, the protection that emerges when enough surrounding people are immunised to prevent disease spread. Pockets of unvaccinated children create gaps in this collective shield.
Recent years have witnessed declining vaccination rates in parts of the UK. Identifying which demographic groups drive these declines allows public health authorities to focus resources where they are most needed.
Strategic Responses
Dr. Obohwemu, who also serves as founder of the PENKUP Research Institute, a prominent public health researcher and influential advocate for international research partnerships who gained widespread recognition for his critically acclaimed novel psychological theories [the Self-Comforting and Coping Theory (SCCT) and the Self-Comforting Attitude Theory (SCAT)], recommends several interventions based on these findings.
Culturally sensitive communication acknowledging diverse backgrounds is essential. Generic national campaigns should be supplemented with materials designed for specific communities, delivered through channels those communities trust. For “White Other” populations, this might include multilingual resources and partnerships with community organizations.
Improving healthcare accessibility reduces opportunities for misinformation to flourish unchallenged. When parents can easily reach healthcare providers to discuss vaccine questions, concerns can be addressed before hardening into refusal. Long appointment waits, brief consultations, and language barriers all create space for hesitancy.
Combating social media misinformation requires sustained effort. Public health authorities must engage on platforms where parents seek information, providing accurate content that competes with false claims. This demands resources for content creation, community management, and rapid response capabilities.
Tailoring Messages
Different demographic groups require different approaches. Older parents might respond to updated safety data addressing concerns rooted in outdated controversies. Conservative parents may prefer messaging that respects individual choice while clearly presenting risk-benefit information, avoiding collectivist framing that triggers ideological resistance.
For communities showing elevated hesitancy, trusted voices within those groups can serve as credible messengers. A recommendation from a respected community leader often carries more weight than official government communications.
Healthcare providers need training and appointment time to address vaccine concerns compassionately rather than dismissively. Parents whose questions receive rushed or condescending responses may leave consultations with strengthened rather than resolved doubts.
Research Methods
Dr. Obohwemu recruited 818 participants through convenience and snowball sampling, methods that efficiently reach diverse populations but may introduce certain biases. Parents completed online questionnaires assessing both demographic characteristics and vaccine attitudes.
Statistical analyses including regression and ANOVA identified which demographic factors significantly predicted hesitancy scores. The large sample size and validated measurement tool strengthen confidence in the findings, though the cross-sectional design captures attitudes at only one point in time.
Building on Previous Work
This study extends Dr. Obohwemu’s earlier research identifying elevated vaccine hesitancy among “White Other” populations. The current work broadens the analysis to examine how multiple demographic factors interact to shape vaccine attitudes across the UK population.
The findings align with international research showing that vaccine hesitancy emerges from complex combinations of individual characteristics, social influences, and systemic factors. No single intervention will eliminate hesitancy, but targeted strategies addressing specific demographic groups show promise.
Next Steps
Future research should track how vaccine attitudes evolve over time and respond to interventions. Longitudinal studies following the same parents across months or years could reveal which factors trigger attitude changes and which interventions prove most effective.
Qualitative research involving in-depth interviews could uncover nuances that surveys miss. Understanding the reasoning behind hesitancy in parents’ own words might suggest additional intervention approaches.
As new vaccines are developed and public health emergencies like the COVID-19 pandemic reshape vaccine discourse, monitoring how demographic patterns shift becomes important for maintaining effective communication strategies.
Protecting Children
Achieving optimal immunisation coverage requires meeting parents where they are with information addressing their specific concerns. Dr. Obohwemu’s research provides a foundation for more targeted, effective vaccine promotion that acknowledges diversity in backgrounds, beliefs, and information sources.
The stakes remain high. Every unvaccinated child faces unnecessary disease risk and potentially contributes to outbreaks threatening vulnerable populations. Evidence-based strategies informed by demographic research offer the best path toward protecting all children through comprehensive immunisation.
The study provides detailed methodology and statistical findings for public health professionals developing vaccine promotion programmes.
Check it out here:
