Kogi Poly Rector Denies Allegation of Nepotism in Appointment of Principal Officers

Spread the love

The Rector of Kogi State Polytechnic, Isa Muhammed has described allegations of nepotism in the recent process of appointment of four principal officers in the institution as false.
Isa, while responding to the allegation in his office on Wednesday, explained that the appointment was done to reflect equity and ethnic balance of the three senatorial districts.
“The appointment of the four principal officials was procedural and done with need for ethnic balancing. The Registrar and Bursar were given to the East, Librarian to the West and Director of Works to the Central.
“The Bursar and Registrar took leads with wide margins in the assessment. For the Liberian, only three applicants made it and the first two with higher scores were those applicants from the West, so one of them was picked.
“Truly, the person who scored second was appointed the Director of Works because that is the last position left and yet no one from the central senatorial axis made it for the other three positions. In the spirit of fairness and ethnic balancing, he had to be picked to fill the position of the central senatorial axis. He was picked not because he was my kinsman or for any shady deal. The appointments are to further unite the people of the state. People should stop this ethnic blackmail,” he said.
There are allegations of nepotism and ethnic bias in the recent recruitment of four principal officers against the Rector and Chairman of the institution’s Governing Council, Professor Sam Egwu.
They were said to have favoured their kinsmen, even when those picked came last in the assessment test conducted by a committee last year and did not, therefore, merit the positions.
In November last year, acting on the instruction of the Governing Council, the Rector advertised for the position of Bursar, Registrar, Director of Works and Librarian.
The Chairman of the Board constituted an eight-man committee, which, on Friday, December 1, 2017, met and on December 19, 2017 conducted an interview and assessment test. The committee forwarded the scores of each candidate to a consultant to compile before making their recommendation for the appointment. However, the committee and some board members said they were surprised when, on January 22, the Rector announced the appointments without waiting for the recommendation of the committee.

The members said the Rector’s decision confirmed the rumour that there was a predetermined selection by the duo to favour their kinsmen, as two of the positions were given to the chairman’s kinsmen.

The Rector, however, said he has explained to the institution staff from the Western axis how they arrived at the appointments.

Spread the love

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *