In the intricate world of politics, a debate rages on about what truly motivates individuals to seek elective office. The prevailing sentiment, echoed by many, suggests that a sincere desire to serve the public should be the primary driver. While the privileges and perks of political power are undeniable, they should never be the sole motivation for a quest for office. This ideal, however, often clashes with the reality of modern political campaigns.
The “Clamour” Tactic: A Theatrical Charade
A peculiar and increasingly common phenomenon has crept into political strategies: the theatrical presentation of ambition as a “clamour” of the people. It’s a well-known tactic where political hopefuls orchestrate a public plea for them to contest. They may even pay individuals or groups to “beg” them to run, creating an illusion of widespread public demand. This charade serves to distance the aspirant from a perceived personal quest for power, instead framing their candidacy as a reluctant response to the will of the people. This strategic move, however, often foreshadows a disconnect between the politician’s true intentions and the public’s needs.
Political Entrepreneurs: The Cost of a Flawed System
When political offices are filled by individuals driven by personal gain—what some term “political entrepreneurs”—the delivery of democracy dividends becomes an uphill battle. These individuals view public office as a business venture, a means to an end rather than a duty of service. Their focus is not on collective well-being but on personal profit and the accumulation of power. The inevitable result is a failure to provide essential services, a lack of accountability, and a betrayal of the public trust. The very fabric of democracy is strained when leaders prioritise their own pockets over the well-being of the people they are meant to represent.
The Absurdity of Second Chances
Perhaps the most perplexing aspect of this trend is when politicians who have previously failed to deliver attempt to use this same archaic tactic to regain relevance. Having been found wanting in their past roles, they try to pull the wool over the public’s eyes, hoping to deceive a weary electorate into giving them another chance. This desperation for a comeback, without a genuine change in approach, underscores a fundamental misunderstanding of what the public truly desires: leaders with a humane and intentional focus on collective well-being. The ambition for political office must be rooted in a genuine commitment to the people, not in a desperate need for a second bite at the apple.
– Apostle Olalekan Aiyenigba writes from Abuja.
