The perennial debate refuses to wither: Does helping others truly pay off, or is it an illusionary creed paraded by moralists to soothe conscience and sustain social order? What appears as an innocuous aphorism— “helping others always pays off” —has provoked centuries of human reflection, generating equal parts reverence and ridicule.
In the cold calculus of survival, altruism is often dismissed as naïveté. Critics argue that benevolence, though poetic in theory, can bleed the benefactor dry—leaving the giver stripped while the world advances with merciless indifference. History abounds with martyrs of generosity whose sacrifices yielded not crowns but coffins, not applause but abandonment. Helping others, in this dark lens, is a theater where the noble are exploited and the selfish inherit the spoils.
Yet to dismiss altruism as futility is to misunderstand its hidden economy. Kindness is not merely transaction; it is a form of spiritual capital, accruing dividends unseen yet inescapable. Helping others may not return as coin or applause, but as legacy—etched in memory, lodged in history, and transmuted into cultural immortality. The great religions of humanity, from Christianity’s parable of the Good Samaritan to Buddhism’s law of karma, stake their entire metaphysical scaffolding on this paradoxical currency of compassion.
The controversy thus deepens: is helping others a ladder to posterity, or a labyrinth to self-ruin? The utilitarian insists it is self-interest in disguise—strategic goodwill yielding reciprocal survival. The idealist counters that even if help breeds betrayal, its worth lies not in reward but in the testimony of one’s character. One side speaks in ledgers, the other in legacies.
Perhaps the ultimate resolution lies in recognizing altruism as both cost and crown. To help is to risk depletion, yet to refuse help is to ensure desolation. Humanity survives not on isolated triumphs but on collective scaffolding. Every civilization’s monument—whether the pyramids of Egypt or the digital architecture of our time—rests upon hands that lifted more than their share.
So the axiom endures, not as shallow comfort but as existential necessity: helping others does not always pay in visible coin, but it pays in the invisible arithmetic of destiny. Refuse it, and society collapses into barbarism. Embrace it, and even in ruin, one stands tall—proof that generosity, though costly, remains the only wealth death cannot embezzle.
– Inah Boniface Ocholi writes from Ayah – Igalamela/Odolu LGA, Kogi state.
08152094428 (SMS Only)
