Court Verdict: Affirmation of Senator Rules and Implications of 1999 Nigeria Constitution Amidst Natasha’s Misconduct

3
Spread the love

The 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) is unequivocal in its provisions regarding the eligibility of individuals seeking to contest for elective positions.

Specifically, Section 66(c) clearly outlines disqualifying conditions for individuals aspiring to become members of the National Assembly, either the House of Representatives or the Senate. Anyone found to have contravened these provisions is constitutionally barred from contesting in future elections for such offices.

In light of this, it is both disappointing and disingenuous for Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan to engage in public grandstanding, especially by issuing a satirical and mocking “apology” directed at the Senate President and the Senate as an institution sometimes ago. This act not only undermined the dignity of the legislative body but also violated a standing court order which had expressly restrained her from making public comments on the matter, as the case was still pending in court as at then.

Unfortunately, her continued disregard for judicial processes has now reflected in a court ruling today that found her guilty of contempt. Consequently, the court has imposed a fine of five million Naira on Senator Natasha, a clear message that no one is above the law.

Beyond the legal consequences, this development has significant political and moral implications. Senator Natasha has betrayed the trust of the good people of Kogi Central Senatorial District, who had hoped for strong, responsible, and effective representation in the Senate. Her actions have not only left our district without meaningful representation due to her ongoing legal distractions and misconduct, but they also risk permanently sidelining her political career & consequently restricting her from contesting.

By breaching constitutional provisions and flouting judicial orders, Senator Natasha now faces the real possibility of being disqualified from contesting in future elections, in line with the stipulations of the 1999 Constitution (as amended). This is not just a personal setback, it is a tragic disservice to her supprters even though they are blinded with emotions.

As we reflect on these developments, it is imperative that public servants at all levels respect the rule of law, uphold the dignity of the offices they occupy, and place the interests of the people above personal ambition or political theatrics.

Democracy thrives only when institutions are respected, and the constitution is upheld without fear or favor.

– Abdulhameed Ivavah writes from Ajaokuta LGA.


Spread the love