The Court of Appeal on Monday delivered a decisive ruling in favour of Distinguished Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, striking out the ₦5 million fine and apology order imposed on her in connection with contempt proceedings arising from her controversial six-month suspension, which she has consistently described as illegal and unconstitutional.
In its judgment delivered on February 9, 2026, the appellate court held that the contempt proceedings were fundamentally flawed, citing the failure to comply with mandatory legal procedures. The court specifically ruled that the failure to properly serve Forms 48 and 49, as required by law, rendered the entire process incompetent and void.
According to the court, the defective procedure vitiated the contempt action ab initio, leading to the resolution of Issue Four squarely in favour of the appellant, Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan.
Consequently, the Court of Appeal set aside the ₦5 million fine earlier imposed on the Kogi Central lawmaker and equally vacated the order directing her to tender an apology, bringing the contempt matter to a definitive close in her favour.
The appeal formed part of the broader legal battle trailing the senator’s six-month suspension from the Senate, a disciplinary action that has generated nationwide controversy and sharp legal criticism. Several constitutional lawyers and civil society groups have argued that the length and nature of the suspension amount to an abuse of legislative powers and an infringement on the rights of her constituents to representation.
Reacting to the judgment, sources within the senator’s legal team described the ruling as a resounding affirmation of due process and the rule of law, noting that disciplinary powers, even within the legislature, must be exercised strictly within constitutional and procedural limits.
“The Court of Appeal has once again reinforced the principle that no authority is above the law. Where due process is ignored, the outcome cannot stand,” a source said.
With the contempt sanctions now nullified, political watchers believe the ruling strengthens Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan’s ongoing challenge to her suspension and may have far-reaching implications for legislative discipline and accountability in Nigeria’s democracy.
The judgment is already being hailed by supporters of the senator as a significant legal and moral victory, and a reminder that the judiciary remains a vital safeguard against procedural excesses within public institutions.
