What Kogi East Can Learn From Asia’s Founder CEOs
Nigeria has no shortage of people who want to lead. What it lacks is a sufficient number of leaders capable of building institutions, enterprises and economic systems that continue to create value after they leave. That distinction is at the heart of McKinsey’s new study of Asia’s extraordinary founder CEOs, and it offers Nigeria a more useful question about leadership: not who can acquire power, but who can turn power into productive capacity.
The Asian founders examined by McKinsey are distinguished not simply by ambition, but by how they convert ambition into enduring organisations. Their model combines long term purpose with disciplined risk taking, innovation, talent development and the ability to scale without losing institutional coherence. The underlying lesson is broader than business. Economies also grow when leaders can identify opportunity, allocate scarce resources, develop people and build systems whose performance does not depend indefinitely on one individual.
Nigeria’s economic performance shows both the possibility and the limits of the current moment. Real GDP expanded by 4.43% year on year in the second quarter of 2026, an improvement from the previous quarter, yet growth remains below the pace required to transform living standards rapidly across a large and youthful population. The World Bank’s prescription is revealing: Nigeria needs a private sector led, public sector facilitated model in which government concentrates on infrastructure, human capital and the conditions that allow businesses to invest, innovate and create productive employment.
That is where Kogi East becomes more than a regional case study. It possesses the ingredients of an industrial economy: agricultural land, mineral resources, strategic transport connections, universities and proximity to Ajaokuta’s industrial complex. The state’s own medium term expenditure framework identifies Ajaokuta and Itakpe as potential foundations for downstream industries ranging from metal fabrication to agricultural equipment. Recent state policy discussions around the Ajaokuta Free Trade Zone have similarly emphasised power, roads, rail, gas connectivity, value added processing and skills transfer.
Yet resources do not automatically become prosperity. A mineral deposit is not an industry. Agricultural land is not an agribusiness. A railway corridor is not a logistics economy. A free trade zone is not an investment destination merely because it has been designated one. Each requires institutions, infrastructure, finance, skills, reliable regulation and entrepreneurs capable of connecting one productive activity to another. Without that ecosystem, development plans risk becoming inventories of potential rather than engines of growth.
This is precisely where the founder CEO offers an uncomfortable lesson to Nigerian politics. A builder does not begin with the question, What can I announce? The more consequential questions are: What capability can I create? What industry can I enable? What supply chain can I connect? What skills can I develop? What infrastructure can lower the cost of production? What institution can still function when I am no longer in office?
For Kogi East, that change in vocabulary is overdue. Political discourse is often dominated by representation, appointments, endorsements, constituency projects and electoral calculations. These matters are not irrelevant, but they are poor substitutes for an economic strategy. Political influence cannot itself employ graduates, process agricultural produce, manufacture equipment or attract long term capital. Influence becomes development only when it is converted into productive systems.
Ajaokuta illustrates the point. Its significance should not be confined to the familiar political language of a steel complex that has never fulfilled its original promise. The larger question is whether its strategic location and industrial potential can anchor an ecosystem of manufacturing, fabrication, engineering, logistics, energy and technical education. If that ecosystem is built, the value extends far beyond the plant itself: suppliers emerge, workers acquire specialised skills, transport networks become more commercially useful and new businesses begin to cluster around the original investment.
Agriculture presents the same opportunity. Kogi East should not remain principally a producer of commodities whose highest value is captured after they leave the region. The development challenge is to connect farmers to storage, processing, finance, technology, packaging, transport and markets. The difference between selling a crop and building an agricultural industry is the difference between participating in a value chain and owning part of it.
The strongest founder CEOs understand this logic instinctively. They do not merely pursue growth; they build the organisational machinery that makes growth repeatable. McKinsey’s research describes leaders who combine a clear mission with calculated risk, develop talent internally and build organisations capable of scaling while retaining their institutional identity. One of the book’s central ideas is particularly relevant to public leadership: the greatest builders ultimately create institutions that outlive them.
Government, of course, is not a corporation, and citizens are not shareholders. A public leader cannot be judged solely by financial returns. The responsibility is wider: security, education, health, infrastructure, opportunity and social stability. But public office nevertheless involves the allocation of scarce resources, and the quality of that allocation determines whether government merely spends money or helps create productive capacity.
That should change the standard by which Nigerian leadership is judged. A governor should not be remembered principally for the number of projects commissioned, nor a legislator merely for the volume of interventions announced. The harder test is whether transport became cheaper, schools became more effective, enterprises became more competitive, young people acquired useful skills, investment increased and institutions became stronger than they were before.
For Kogi East, the strategic choice is therefore larger than the next election. The region can continue producing political influence without proportionate economic leverage, or it can begin producing institutions and enterprises capable of compounding prosperity across generations. Its leaders should be asking how agriculture can feed industry, how universities can feed enterprise, how infrastructure can feed markets and how young people can acquire skills that connect them to opportunities beyond the geography of the region.
The same principle applies to Nigeria as a whole. The country does not need a political class permanently preoccupied with who occupies which office. It needs a leadership culture capable of thinking beyond the electoral calendar and measuring success by productivity, institutional strength and the capacity to create opportunities at scale.
The ultimate achievement of a founder is not that the organisation bears his name. It is that the organisation no longer depends on his presence to succeed. That is the standard Nigeria should demand from public leadership.
The question is no longer who can lead Kogi East or Nigeria. The harder question is who can build something that keeps working when the leader is gone. That is the difference between occupying power and creating value.
– Inah Boniface Ocholi writes from Ayah – Igalamela/Odolu LGA, Kogi state.
08152094428 (SMS Only)
