Politics rewards organisation more than numbers. Across democracies, electorates that remain divided often lose influence to smaller but more united coalitions. That reality is at the centre of growing concerns about Igalaland. Persistent rivalry, exclusion, and factional politics among some political actors have fueled debates about whether internal divisions could weaken the kingdom’s ability to produce a future governor. While Igalaland remains one of the state’s largest political blocs, electoral success depends on unity, coalition-building, voter turnout, and broad public support—not population alone.
Political scientists have long argued that fragmentation reduces bargaining power. When leaders pursue competing ambitions instead of a shared strategy, votes can splinter, alliances weaken, and opponents gain an advantage. Nigeria’s electoral history contains many examples in which divided political camps lost elections to better-organised rivals. This pattern is not unique to Kogi State; it is a recurring feature of competitive politics across the country.
Another concern is the use of exclusionary rhetoric or politics based on identity. Such approaches can discourage cooperation, alienate potential allies, and deepen mistrust within and across communities. In a diverse state like Kogi, successful candidates usually require support that extends beyond their immediate ethnic or regional base. Durable political victories are often built on inclusive coalitions rather than narrow identity politics.
At the same time, it would be inaccurate to assume that any ethnic group is destined to govern simply because another is divided. Elections are shaped by many factors, including party structures, candidate quality, campaign strategy, voter participation, and alliances across local government areas. Smaller ethnic groups or political blocs can become electorally competitive when they organise effectively and build broad-based support, just as larger blocs can lose influence if they fail to do the same.
The lesson for Kogi East is therefore strategic rather than emotional. Political influence is strengthened by consensus, credible leadership, and the ability to work across differences. Internal competition is a normal part of democracy, but it should not prevent collaboration on shared political objectives. Leaders who place collective interests above personal ambition are more likely to earn public confidence and negotiate from a position of strength.
The path to Lugard House will not be determined by rhetoric alone. It will be decided by organisation, inclusive leadership, respect for democratic competition, and the ability to unite voters around a common vision. If Kogi East’s political actors wish to remain influential in future governorship contests, their greatest challenge may not come from rival districts but from their capacity to overcome internal division and build enduring political unity.
– Inah Boniface Ocholi writes from Ayah – Igalamela/Odolu LGA, Kogi state.
08152094428 (SMS Only)
