By Musa Tanimu Nasidi
As political permutations ahead of the 2027 general elections gather momentum, Kogi State is steadily emerging as a theatre of intrigue, ambition, and internal contestation—particularly within the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC). At the centre of the unfolding debate is the controversial issue of alleged automatic return tickets for incumbent lawmakers, a development that, though yet to be officially confirmed, is already stirring unease across party ranks.
In any democracy, legitimacy flows from the people. Elections are designed to be competitive and reflective of popular will. Yet, the growing whispers of endorsements without consultation raise serious concerns about internal party democracy and accountability within political parties.

A Brewing Storm Within APC
The suggestion that some sitting lawmakers may be handed automatic tickets without subjecting themselves to party primaries has unsettled many stakeholders in Kogi APC. For aspirants who have invested heavily—financially and politically—in mobilising support, such rumours are not only discouraging but potentially destabilising.
Lokoja I State Constituency illustrates this tension vividly. With over 18 aspirants reportedly vying for the APC ticket, the political atmosphere is already charged. However, indications that an incumbent—who allegedly has neither formally declared interest nor engaged with grassroots stakeholders—might secure an automatic ticket have triggered discontent.
Hon. Muhammed Isah, a campaign director to one of the leading aspirants, described the situation as “a dangerous trend.” According to him, after extensive consultations with party leaders, stakeholders, and local government executives, the sudden emergence of such claims undermines the spirit of fair competition within the party.
The Risk of Political Complacency
While endorsing incumbents is not uncommon, especially where performance justifies continuity, blanket endorsements—particularly of lawmakers perceived as underperforming—can prove counterproductive.
Political observers warn that such strategies may inadvertently strengthen opposition parties. In Kogi State, emerging opposition platforms, especially the African Democratic Congress (ADC), are increasingly positioning themselves to capitalise on internal dissatisfaction within the APC.
When incumbents are shielded from competition, the incentive to deliver effective representation diminishes. Constituents who feel neglected may ultimately express their dissatisfaction at the polls, regardless of party loyalty.
Grassroots Democracy vs. Political Imposition
The APC, like many political parties in Nigeria, has consistently pledged commitment to internal democracy. However, controversies surrounding candidate selection continue to test that commitment.
Party primaries are meant to provide a level playing field for aspirants to demonstrate their popularity and capacity. Circumventing this process risks alienating loyal party members who are crucial during general elections.
In constituencies such as Lokoja I, voters are becoming increasingly discerning. Issues like constituency projects, legislative performance, accessibility, and responsiveness now play a significant role in shaping electoral choices.
Will the Electorate Push Back?
The critical question remains: even if automatic tickets are granted, will the electorate accept them?
Nigeria’s political environment is gradually evolving. Recent electoral cycles have shown that incumbency and party dominance no longer guarantee victory. Voters are becoming more assertive, placing greater emphasis on performance and accountability.
In Kogi State, where socio-economic expectations remain high, voters may be less inclined to endorse candidates perceived as ineffective or disconnected from grassroots realities.
The Way Forward
For the APC in Kogi, the challenge lies in balancing internal cohesion with democratic integrity. Transparency, inclusiveness, and adherence to due process will be essential in managing the current tensions.
Conducting credible and competitive primaries could restore confidence among party members and produce candidates with genuine grassroots support. On the other hand, imposing candidates risks deepening internal divisions and strengthening opposition forces.
Conclusion
The controversy surrounding return tickets for Kogi lawmakers is more than an internal party issue—it is a reflection of the broader struggle for democratic accountability in Nigeria.
Political parties must recognise that power ultimately resides with the people. While automatic tickets may offer short-term convenience, only performance, engagement, and accountability can secure long-term electoral success.
As 2027 approaches, the electorate will have the final say—and they may well ask a fundamental question: if lawmakers expect to be returned unchallenged, what have they done to truly earn the people’s mandate?
– Musa writes from Lokoja.



