By Yabagi Mohammed
Technology sped up information deregulation. Barriers fell. Gatekeepers weakened. Publishing power moved from institutions to individuals. The world embraced this shift with urgency. Citizens turned into reporters. Content on demand became normal. Speed replaced verification.
This shift created access and voice. It also created risk.
Today, anyone with a smartphone holds a printing press. One post reaches thousands within minutes. In Nigeria alone, internet penetration stands above 50 percent, with over 120 million active mobile connections. That scale means a rumour in one town travels nationwide before facts catch up.
In the name of activism and free expression, some actors weaponize digital media. They package falsehood as news. They edit clips to distort context. They publish unverified claims to trigger outrage. Algorithms reward engagement, not accuracy. Anger spreads faster than restraint. Sensational headlines attract clicks. Calm corrections struggle for attention.
The consequences are real.
- Reputations collapse overnight
- Businesses lose customers
- Communities fracture along ethnic and religious lines
- Security agencies respond to false alarms
- Elections face manipulation
Digital platforms amplify human impulses. Schadenfreude, envy, resentment. When content humiliates or exposes, many share before they reflect. The desire to trend fuels reckless publication. Virality becomes currency. Attention becomes power.
A dangerous pattern has emerged. Self appointed defenders of the people build audiences through outrage. They frame themselves as truth tellers. They reject editorial standards. They dismiss verification as censorship. They thrive on the ignorance of large audiences who lack media literacy.
Every published claim carries weight. Words influence perception. Perception shapes action. A fabricated story about communal violence can trigger panic. A false allegation against a public official can incite unrest. A manipulated image can deepen distrust in institutions.
Traditional media once filtered information through layers of editing. Reporters verified facts. Editors demanded sources. Legal teams assessed risk. Those safeguards reduced harm, even if imperfectly. Digital media removed many of these filters. The result is speed without responsibility.
The solution is not to silence voices. Open discourse remains essential to democracy. The task is to restore consequence to communication.
First, strengthen media literacy. Citizens must learn to question headlines, check sources, and pause before sharing. Schools and universities should integrate digital verification skills into curricula.
Second, professional media houses must reclaim authority through credibility. Invest in fact checking. Publish corrections promptly. Build trust through consistency.
Third, platforms must refine algorithms to reduce the spread of demonstrably false content. Transparency in moderation policies builds confidence.
Fourth, enforce existing laws against defamation, incitement, and cybercrime without targeting legitimate dissent. Accountability deters abuse.
Freedom of expression carries responsibility. Rights without restraint breed chaos. Technology expanded the public square. It did not abolish consequences.
Information shapes nations. When falsehood dominates, trust erodes. When trust erodes, institutions weaken. The health of a democracy depends not only on access to speech, but on the integrity of what is spoken.
The choice before society is clear. Elevate standards or normalize disorder. Speed or substance. Noise or truth.
The future of public discourse depends on that decision.
Yabagi Mohammed is a journalist, Public Relations Professional, Writer, Researcher and teacher of communication.
